Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1531593

Complaint Review: Donna SteenKamp - North Carolina

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Ava — JACKSONVILLE United States
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Donna SteenKamp North Carolina United States

Donna SteenKamp Title Trac who owns my home.com Pathological liar makes promises gets your money and then does not deliver North Carolina

*Author of original report: Donna SteenKamp is not trust worthy

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: "Donna SteenKamp Title Trac who owns my home.com Pathological liar..."

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

A gentleman named Andrew who got his house foreclosed on in  Florida, referred me to a Donna Steenkamp in North Carolina of Title Tracs and her website who owns my home .com and a William McCaffrey in Arizona to assit with defense of foreclosure since the investor group who now claimed to hold my mortgage had  deficient paper work and  no valid lien acting under the shield of Wilmington Savings fund Society FSB DBA Christiana Trust as Trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust the beneficiary (an investor group not a national bank). I spoke to Donna Steenkamp on Feb 20, 2024 and she suggested I get her $450 package to find out who currently owns my loan, since Pretium had not done their paperwork properly in 2016 and failed to obtain a valid lien signed by the assignor GreenTree/Ditech to the assignee Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB DBA Christiana Trust as Trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust. Instead, they had Pretium assigned to Pretium. You cannot do that. I told Donna I had a hearing Feb 21 and would ask for a continuance which was granted to March 6, 2024. The judge was going to also decide on March 6 if I could have  testimony from an expert by” zoom” so I told Donna that I needed her to testify as a researcher March 6 since the court had not allowed an expert by zoom yet and she said yes but she preferred to appear by phone not zoom and she would get the owner of my loan in time for March 6, 2024. So, on Feb 27, 2024, I paid the $450 for the information on who owns my loan and for her to testify via phone or zoom on March 6, 2024, about her findings.

After she got her money, she became a different person and reneged on all her promises to me.

1st she refused to go to court and made up all these excuses that I did not pay for a testimony and that she was not the one who had first hand knowledge of the findings, but a William McCaffrey did the research. Well I had agreed to buy her services for $450 because she made a special arrangement with me and she told me she was the one who acted as an employee for William and got the info about who owned my loan and because of the limited time, she would testify on my behalf March 6, 2024  because the judge had not approved the expert witness yet. So, I purchased 2 things Feb 27, 2024, for the price of $450. The valid information about who currently owns my loan and her testimony on March 6, 2024, in court via Zoom or phone about her findings who owns my loan.

Besides reneging to go to court on March 6, 2024, she gave me some outdated information Feb 29, 2024, alleging Fannie Mae Trust owed my loan in   2009. She submitted a snip it. My name is not on it nor is my address, so I asked her for a verified document with my name and address on it connecting these facts to me and my address because her snip it looked faked. She ranted, raved, and refused to hand over anything that looked realistic.

I told her I wanted to cancel because she failed to go to court as promised and she also failed to tender a real looking document that would hold up in court that stated who the real owner of my mortgage currently is. I contacted Fanne Mae, and they said they are NOT THE OWNER of my mortgage and that they only guarantee a mortgage they do not own it.

So, it appears that Donna Steenkamp is not only dishonest, but she is also a pathological liar and has engaged in a scheme to obtain money from people who are going through a hardship, simply to swindle them to benefit herself only. I am also filing a complaint about this fraud with the Consumer Protection Agency and the Federal Trade Commission. STAY AWAY THIS GIRL IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY AND SHE WILL LIE TO YOU AND RIP YOU OFF.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/12/2024 03:37 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/donna-steenkamp/north-carolina-title-trac-1531593. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

Donna SteenKamp is not trust worthy

AUTHOR: Ava - (United States)

POSTED: Monday, April 01, 2024

1. I am refinancing my home not loosing it and Donna Steenkamp is clueless and  trys to practice law without a license. She stated I needed to buy the $450 package she offered on line to find out who is the current owner of my loan. she gave me false information that Fannie Mae currently owns my loan but Fannie Mae finances mortgage originators only and they do not deal with consumers. Fannie mae had financed my home to the original lender Christian Financial in 2009 but the loan was sold  in 2016 to someone else according to Fannie Mae. Donna Steenkamp also said she would appear by phone in court to varify her fiindings and she reneged on that too. She failed to give me what I purchased "the owner of my loan" and she "failed to varify in court her findings." This person is a FRAUD

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

"Donna SteenKamp Title Trac who owns my home.com Pathological liar..."

AUTHOR: WhoOwnsMyHome.Com - (United States)

POSTED: Monday, April 01, 2024

Before WhoOwnsMyHome.Com does ANY full investigation which costs $1595 and up, we encourage people to buy the bare minimun to learn IF there is a problem in their mortgage transaction that should be further investigated before spending the money.  Mc Cannie did exactly that, however she then demanded information and expert witness testimony she did NOT pay for.\

In fact, the initial search located her loan in a mortgage-backed security (MBS) she knew NOTHING about!  It proved that the WRONG ENTITY was foreclosing on her!  Pure GOLD evidence.  However, Cannie demanded that the research states her "name and address" which is NOT how the screenshots taken from the investor portal look like.  There are thousands of loans in each MBS - it is NOT specific to hers. 

She demanded that we change it to show her name and address.  If we did, it taints the evidence as it was changed.  Her also demanding that I 'testify' on her behalf at a hearing is also not helping her as it would be pure hearsay - I was not the person who pulled the evidence from the portal.

Cannie got abusive with me, demanding I do things I could not legally do.  It is clearly stated on the site precisely what is being purchased, including that NO REFUNDS are possible as we are charged within our subscription for the raw data we pull.  Ms Cannie demanded research and services she did NOT pay for.  I had to block communication from her as whe was beligerent and abusive.

It's a shame that someone refused to understand the power of what she leared from our initial research.  She is now losing her home, through no fault of mine.  It could have been stopped.  Cannie's comments on this site are slanderous, constituting libel of which I will refer to our attorneys.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now